Does Where I Live Change How I Recover? Five Years of Whoop Data Across 8 Places
"Wherever you go, there you are." - Jon Kabat-Zinn
In my last Whoop project I found that going to bed earlier was one of the best things I ever did for my health. Since then, I've moved from Vancouver to Querétaro, spent stretches in Tijuana and Mexico City, and squeezed in a few trips. So I wanted to answer a new question: does where I am change how I sleep, strain and recover?
Here's what each of those means in Whoop:
- Sleep (sleep performance, 0 to 100%): how much I slept compared with how much my body needed, also factoring in how consistent and efficient that sleep was.
- Strain (0 to 21): how much load I put on my body in a day, based on my heart rate across the day plus the muscular load from workouts.
- Recovery (0 to 100%): how ready my body is each morning, based mainly on my heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate while I sleep, plus sleep and breathing rate.
The short answer
- I recovered best by the ocean. Tijuana and Cozumel were the only places where my recovery sat well above my normal.
- I slept worst on short trips and steadiest in Querétaro, where I live now.
- My strain was highest in Vancouver, where I worked out the most.
How I did it
I matched 1,899 nights of Whoop data (August 2021 to October 2026) to my travel log, so every night has a place attached.
- The problem: my habits kept improving over those five years, so comparing raw averages between places would mostly show when I lived there, not where.
- The fix: I compared each night against my own 90-day average using Z-scores (I explain them here).
- How to read it: a Z-score of +1 means that night was one standard deviation better than my usual. So the "vs my normal" numbers show the effect of the place, not the year.
| Place | Nights | Avg recovery | Sleep performance | Avg day strain |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vancouver | 1,170 | 66% | 79% | 12.5 |
| Querétaro | 623 | 65% | 86% | 10.1 |
| Mexico City | 55 | 64% | 81% | 10.4 |
| Tijuana | 38 | 77% | 81% | 10.9 |
| Cozumel* | 6 | 83% | 86% | 11.7 |
| Las Vegas* | 3 | 39% | 58% | 9.4 |
| Hawaii* | 2 | 47% | 66% | 14.8 |
| San Francisco* | 2 | 63% | 71% | 8.0 |
*Fewer than 7 nights there (Cozumel 6, Las Vegas 3, Hawaii 2, San Francisco 2), so take those rows with a grain of sand.
Quick note: I'm not a health professional. This is one person's data, and Whoop scores aren't a diagnosis.
1 / 4 · Recovery
I recovered best by the ocean
| Place | Avg recovery | vs my normal |
|---|---|---|
| Cozumel* | 83% | +0.84 SD |
| Tijuana | 77% | +0.58 SD |
| Vancouver | 66% | 0.00 SD |
| Querétaro | 65% | −0.03 SD |
| Mexico City | 64% | −0.15 SD |
| San Francisco* | 63% | −0.07 SD |
| Hawaii* | 47% | −0.82 SD |
| Las Vegas* | 39% | −1.13 SD |
*Fewer than 7 nights there (Cozumel 6, Las Vegas 3, Hawaii 2, San Francisco 2), so take those rows with a grain of sand.
- Tijuana is the standout. I go there to visit family, and over 38 nights my recovery averaged more than half a standard deviation above my normal (p < 0.001).
- Cozumel was a vacation, and it shows: the highest recovery of anywhere, even if it's only 6 nights.
- Vancouver and Querétaro, my two home bases, sit right at my normal, which is what you'd expect from where I spend most of my time.
- Las Vegas and Hawaii were the lowest, but they were only 2 to 3 nights each.